Blood is Thicker than Votes
Mood:
caffeinated
After seeing Fahrenheit 9/11, all I can say is that you should watch it. It is a good analysis of how Bush came to power, how he took a massive amount of vacations pre-9/11, and all the different connections between Cheney, Halliburton, American companies, and the profit involved in rebuilding Iraq. This movie isn't out to convince Republicans of anything, it is to try to persuade the undecided. "What it might do is influence those few still on the fence; what it will do is reinforce the position of those who are anti-Bush." (USAToday). The film is there to give info to the American people, who Moore claims have been mislead, mistreated, and lied to. I am not saying Michael Moore is my fave director, or that I back him up on everything he has ever said, I'm just saying you should see the movie. It is an informative movie, very provocative. And if you have a problem with the movie, the facts in it, or such, check out this website:
Michael Moore Website that offers back up information and facts for each section of the movie
One part of the film that I found particularly interesting was a section where Moore goes to Washington, D.C. and stops Senators and Congressmen on the streets. He tells them he is trying to get more people in the Senate and the Congress to enlist their children, since many of them have sons who are eligible to fight, and only one is in Iraq. A congressman who is stopped talks to Moore for a few minutes and says he can't send his son to Iraq because he has kids. Hmm. Last time I checked, there were many military personnel with kids, including one of my boss's sons, whose wife just gave birth to twins. It seems to me that many people are willing to go and vote in favor of war, but not enough people are actually willing to go do it. Poor kids who can't afford college and have no hopes of getting in are roped into joining the military in the premise of getting a free education.
As far as GKC's (movie theater in Marquette that refused to show F9/11) bull line about the film not being supportive of the troops, Moore is critical of the war, but not critical of the troops. He spends a large portion of the film tracking a mother whose son died in the war, and shows troops in Iraq. On his website, he has a link to supporting the troops by sending books and letters. So needless to say, I don't think the film is harshly critical of the troops. It is critical of the reasons for why they are there. It is like the difference between being patriotic and loving your country, but questioning your government.
Patti Davis, daughter of Ronald Reagan: "Seeing Fahrenheit 9/11 made me think deeply about love of country, how it molds us, drives and emboldens us and how it can sometimes make us so angry we want to shout out to the world: 'No, this is wrong.' Many things have been said about the movie, and of course about its director, Michael Moore. But I don't think I've heard anyone comment on Moore's love for America. It seemed evident to me that the film was born from that love." (Newsweek, 7/20)
Also, an interesting comment for everyone to read from my friend Shannon:
As a Canadian, if I could say anything to U.S. voters this election, it would be to think of their vote being not just to elect a U.S. president, but to elect a world leader. The U.S. is so powerful that the president's and government's decisions affect the whole world. Unfortunately, those of us who are outside of the U.S. who are affected by those decisions, can't vote in the election. So think of your vote as being not just for yourself, but on behalf of a world full of people who are affected by the decisions made by the U.S., but have no say in what those decisions are.
Posted by randomsquirrels
at 4:58 PM EDT